By: Blindlight – The Watcher on the Wall
I am still pondering the subject of what just happened after the ‘911 Andrew Anglin’ article aftermath. Late last night, after producing this video, I started thinking through the ramifications of these blasphemous claims made by Anglin from his September 12th redo of his 911 article where he back tracked, seemingly, from his original assertion that Arabs were primarily responsible for 911.
Actually, it turns out he didn’t really backtrack because, as he says, if they coulda done it without Israel’s help they woulda and like Israel, Saudis are fake allies who hate us so, yes, we must blame them because they are actually just “sand monkeys” who dislike us for our freedoms!
After deNugent called him to the carpet in an email stating this:
“Well, it’s been 15 years since 19 Moslems, mostly from Saudi Arabia, blew up our towers and George W. Bush declared “war on terrorism.”
This is the David Duke-Don Black line, and Andrew Anglin is now overtly in bed with them, as even a cursory glance at the DS website demonstrates. Mike Delaney is livid, since this sentence attacks his truthful and masterful 2008 911MissingLinks documentary. However, I did point out to Mike that a bit over halfway down in the Anglin article I find this sentence:
“There is also a real possibility that Israel itself planned or assisted with the 911 attacks.”
So is Anglin is having it both ways…. and maybe going both ways just for now? Is he going to gradually tone down the Jew authorship of 9/11 until it is totally gone and go full-Duke/Black on this?
deNugent then asks this:
So I would appreciate your frank answer, Andrew. Do you believe Israel and the Jews did 9/11, or was it, as Michael Moore, David Duke and Alex Jones say, “the Saudis”?
“Has anyone that I or Mike Delaney know physically SEEN you in the last month?”
Would you be willing to go on Skype video chat with Mike or with me, and prove you are okay and you are in fact you?”
…we have these prime Anglin quotes he gave in response. Within this text, I look back at many WN false flag reactions and see this very same orchestrated behavior in their responses. So what if Arabs did’t do this, we need to scapegoat Arabs out so we will use it! Anglin goes on to say this:
“The Saudis are stupid, hateful monkeys, and would have wanted to do 911 either way. Moslems celebrated 911 across the planet. They are constantly calling for more attacks……So, there isn’t really any conceivable difference between “Jews did 911” and “Saudis did 911.” They are allies, they both hate America and they both wanted to start all of these wars in the Middle East to take down their enemies. They have both been caught recently providing support for ISIS. Their interests overlap 100%.”
Who does this man work for?
I have referred to this characterization, that Saudis and Jews are providing support for ISIS as intentionally sloppy truth or in actuality, misdirection. It’s strongly believed by many that Jews are behind the war on terror as well as THE CREATION of ISIS. This allows Anglin, by stating it this way, to claim that Jews don’t conspire and simply try to influence evil, bad Muslims who are already acting out. This also underplays the reality that the Saudi Kings are essentially Jewish, western creations totally being good goy,…assuming the family are goy to begin with, which is in doubt.
Anglin went on to say:
“So, yes. The Jews did do 911. But only because it would have been impossible for the Arabs to pull-off such an event without Jewish help. If the Saudis had been capable of getting the US government to let them do it, they would have done it on their own. They wanted these wars just as much as Israel, because any stable, secular Arab government is a threat to Saudi Arabia in the same way it is a threat to Israel.”
I find it interesting that Anglin has to resort to high speculation to try and get substance for his evil Saudi Arabs theory, never mind that by stating that 19 Muslims did 911 and not mentioning “controlled demolitions” he is counting on his mostly clueless low IQ white followers to totally miss the misdirection and regurgitate his words to others as facts.
As I pondered this Anglin article for 24 hours, a bad taste sat in my mouth. He had won over his critics with “lawyer talk” and his critics were pacified. John deNugent was pacified, seemingly!
It took me about a day to see the problem. It goes back to the fact Anglin has intentionally for the last three years accepted Jewish explanations for false flag events to build an anti-Muslim narrative. At the same time, he has bad mouthed those that would challenge Jewish explanations of these events and basically called them bad for the movement and MAYBE THEY SHOULD LEAVE?…
I, now, see that without these lies sold as truth, he couldn’t make these speculations about Muslim objectives and have them accepted without people falling for the cons he sold. Happily, I pointed out his false flag intentional misdirections almost everytime as they were occurring and anyone who has been a regular reader of mine can attest to that fact if they have paid attention. I began in the spring of 2015 with an all out Anglin assault on these matters.
Clearly, those in deNugent’s email clique that took part in this back and forth on Tuesday were quite easily sold that Andrew’s core explanations of why Muslims can be blamed have merit ( a very worrisome, problematic fact and until corrected, there is no hope for our cause)
Then I see a Lana Lokteff or an Angelo Gage, foaming at the mouth over Muslims after a staged event and I see, “It’s not madness, what they are doing, it’s subversion of the movement they are leading in the service to the Jew!” A trick the Jews have been doing with dissent (making it fake by leading it) for centuries.
It’s called “conning the goy” and you need to know!