This is the only time I will make a post with a trigger warning, as I am not a fan of social justice warriors and their childish “microaggression” tendancies. But this needs an actual trigger warning for rape victims; there is graphic material.
It seems we’ve all heard of Roosh V by now. Recently (Note: this was originally written in early 2016), when the latest media saturation of him occurred, I had little information on him and so I fell for the deception of his rape advocacy article being satire. I didn’t care to look deeper until I kept noticing all of these people being obsessed with him, both those who support him and those who don’t. And it really seems to be causing a divide between people. So out of curiosity, I hit google. It is now obvious that the so-called “satirical” article is a distraction tool, meant to make people write Roosh off as a harmless, possibly trollish and chauvinistic (as an anti-feminist woman, it’s really hard to use that word) satirist. You’ll see on the following pages, some of which are from his site, posts by him and excerpts from his books that prove he is indeed an advocate of rape and, if not a fraud, then a rapist himself.
“After dinner we went upstairs and I eased her onto my king-size bed. It took four hours of foreplay and at least thirty repetitions of ‘No, Roosh, no’ until she allowed my penis to enter her vagina. No means no—until it means yes. The sex was painful for her. I was only the second guy she’d ever had sex with…She whimpered like a wounded puppy dog the entire time, but I really wanted to have an orgasm, so I was ‘almost there’ for about ten minutes. After sex she sobbed for a good while…” – Roosh V
Roosh seems to think that all women are tentacles of one creature with the same vapid personality. That may be just because he was raised muslim, or because he is a dumbass who got burned. Check out these articles at his site:
Look at this bitter whining. *Gasp* Someone spent half an hour talking to you as a friend?! What an annoying cunt! – “I spent 30 minutes on a girl who had no sexual interest in me, but who didn’t mind having an ultimately meaningless conversation because at that moment I was more exciting than her smartphone or friends. In other words, I was just another TV channel, another app, another web site, another radio station, another dancing cock that made her life slightly more interesting and tolerable than what she is capable of doing herself. She used me to temporarily forget about her boring existence…You want from them a specific role that only a female can provide, meaning you plan on either extracting intimacy from her or from one of her friends, and if not then you’re a damn fool because there is nothing more a girl not related to you by blood can provide.” And check out the amusing last part, where he bitches that you actually have to date women to get laid
You have to wonder what sort of person seemingly attracts so many emotionally unstable women. It’s possible that these were rape situations in which the women were in such a traumatized state that their behaviour would be perfectly understandable, even denying that they were hurt if he terrified them.
He thinks women are impeding his “sacred nut” when they want him to slow down so they can cum. (And here’s Rooshs article referenced in that one). Not surprising, from the guy who complains about having to do hours of foreplay in order to penetrate a woman. He’s a lazy delusional mess of a misogynist. Yes, even a non-feminist can see that.
The bitterest of the bitter Roosh posts. I don’t approve of drunk people having sex, because it blurs and confuses lines of consent, even when both people are drunk. People should know their limits and control themselves. And I don’t think people should treat sex like a string of “micro-aggressions” where they have to ask for permission each minute. But this little article is Roosh blatantly wishing he didn’t have to be pestered by considerations of morality when it comes to sex.
There are many nasty articles at his site, but also a few that properly debunk feminist nonsense. All of the articles I looked at seemed to have some level of bitterness to them, an “oh woe is me, why do women not pile into my bed?!” tone. From reading some and skimming others, there seems to be more whiny “feel sorry for me because women are fucking bitches and it’s so hard to get laid”, type articles than properly anti-feminist or mens rights ones. It’s equal parts pathetic, amusing, and disturbing.
There are free pdfs of his books floating around if you still think the backlash against him is just feminist bullshit. I won’t post links to minimize the chances of them getting taken down, but google around. Plus there is all of the incriminating information he posts on his own site.
So what do you think, is he a narcissist, an attention whore, a psycho or something else? Whatever the case, there is definitely something wrong with this guy.