Suffrage, Women’s Lib, Feminism & Cultural Marxism

In battle what would be your first target? That what makes your enemy stronger or weaker? If I have a job, how does that make you less of a man? If I drive a car, how does that make you less of a man? If I am an executive at a major corporation, how does that make you less of a man? If I vote, how does that make you less of a man? If I go to war, how does that make you less of a man? If I make the same money as you, how does that make you less of a man? If I get a master’s degree, how does that make you less of a man? If I don’t want you to hit me, how does that make you less of a man? If I own property how does that make you less of a man? It doesn’t. Your manhood is not based upon what females do, say or own. It never was.

If I vote, does that make me any less of a wife and mother? If I drive, does that make me any less of a wife and mother? If I go to college and get a degree does that make me any less of a wife and mother? If I own property does that make me any less of a wife and mother? If I don’t want you to hit me, does that make me any less of a wife and mother? If I am able to defend myself and my kids when you are away does that make me less than a wife and mother? You know where I’m going with this…. What makes a man or a woman is NOT dependent upon the opposite sex. Anyone who believes that nonsense really needs to grow up. I do not advocate for a Matriarchal nor a Patriarchal society. I advocate for a Meritocracy. Quite simply put, I believe that within a system based on Merit people strive to be the best, for perfection. It is a system that does not base its beliefs only upon sex.
 
I believe in what is known within the Heathen community as “blood memory”. Blood Memory is described as our ancestral (genetic) connection to our language, songs, spirituality, and teachings. Your intuition would be a good but not complete example on how blood memory works. It is the key that unlocks the door to your awakening. It is a common notion within the White Nationalist community that Whites ruled Ancient Egypt. Therefore I will not go into any in-depth discussion on why I have quoted sources from this civilization. If you want more information regarding such claims feel free to contact me, or better yet research the information on your own. So my question is, What is the history of European Women’s place within the social structure within the tribe? Today I will use one example (there are many). This example I chose because if we do not wake up then we will end up just like they are. Question: What exactly was Women’s Suffrage? According to the online dictionary it is quite simply, the right of women to vote. Period. Nothing more, nothing less. Just the right for a woman to vote within her community / Nation. Something our Ancestral mothers once had the right to do.
Carrie Chapman Catt is the woman who supposedly started the Suffrage movement in America, and no, she was not a Jew. In fact when I look up all the women who were involved within the movement when it began with the exception of a couple of black women, they were all White Christians. And believe me, if there was a Jew involved back then we would know about it… these people love to brag and make sure everyone knows what they did. Which begs the question, Where did the idea that Suffrage began with a Jew come from? We will get to the Jewish question a little later, right now we should address those who would wish to put asunder the right of women to vote. I have yet to see ANY statistical information that they use that separates White women from non-white women. Why? Because when you break it down by race, white women and white men vote almost identically across the board. Non-whites, who when they get grouped into the women’s vote absolutely skew the fact. Proof? Okay here you go: Their claim: If it wasn’t for “women” Obama would never have been president. Let’s look at the exit polls from the 2012 election, shall we?
According to an article regarding the 2012 election on the Huffington Post website, “There have been several headlines about how women, young voters, and even Catholics led the way for Obama. However, it wasn’t the youth, female or any aspect of the religious vote that we should credit; it was the African American and Latino vote. As it stands, no other poll measure (aside from political party) explains as much variance in the election outcome than race and ethnicity; not, the opinions on the economy, not health care and not foreign policy.“ (emphasis mine) The article continues, “ When the data are broken down by gender and race the results show that only minority women voted in the majority for Obama, white women mostly voted for Romney. “ In fact 35% of white men and 42% of white women voted for Obama. That is only a 7 point difference! When we look at the Republican side we have 62% white men and 56% of white women, a 6 point difference. Compare that to 96% of black women and 76% Latino. Obviously if you group white women in with that it looks god awful, especially when you are a White Nationalist. It would mean that women decided the vote. But when you break it down by RACE, like we ALL should, we can plainly see that the non-whites are the people these folks should be attacking. Not their own White Women!
White Women and Men voted Majority Republican 2012 Exit Poll
The article continues: “ All white voters regardless of age —18-29, 30-44, 45-64, and 65 and older — voted a majority for Romney. All other racial ethnic groups, regardless of age, voted unanimously for Obama.” What? Regardless of AGE all white voters voted majority Republican.
Votes by Age and Race
Now you are going to just LOVE this next graphic… Check out the White/Jewish … yep unbelievable, huh?
Check out the White Jewish support for Obama!
Other research points in the same direction. But since Jews identify and include whites, and they are democratic, does this mean that THEY encompass the majority of the democrats within the demographic of white race? http://www.people-press.org/2015/04… Now we MUST ask ourselves, why on earth would professed White Nationalists, specifically those in the AltRight attack their own women with SKEWED facts? Why? Lana Lokteff has said on camera that she thinks that women should not vote, then she says women and men who are married vote the same and if they didn’t there would be a house divided. So if men and women who are married vote the same what purpose does it solve to remove the White Woman’s vote? Explain that.
Especially now, when we are becoming a minority in our own country. Wouldn’t it make sense to have as many whites voting OUR WAY as we can? What we MUST do is VOTE (but that should be obvious lol) Actually what we MUST do is REMOVE the non-white/Jewish influence, ie: If you want to stop someone from voting stop THEM, not your own people. Note: From this data it is plain to see that the voting demographic has changed in this country to a non-white majority. This is not good my brothers and sisters, not good at all. Before we go on we need to define a few more key words. What is Women’s Liberation? The online dictionary defines it as the advocacy of the liberation of women from inequalities and subservient status in relation to men, and from attitudes causing these (now generally replaced by the term feminism ). Question: What is wrong with not wanting to be subservient to ANYONE? What is wrong with having the same opportunity and status as our male counterparts? Personally for me, I see absolutely no issue with this, especially given our Ancestral history.
What is Feminism? The online dictionary defines it as the advocacy of women’s rights on the grounds of political, social, and economic equality to men. Origin and etymology of the word Feminism: 1851, “qualities of females;” 1895, “advocacy of women’s rights;” from French féminisme. The word has been around a long time and nothing negative was associated with it. Question: Who changed the wording and why did they change it and why all the negativity? To find the answer we need to look at when did Women’s Liberation become “feminism”. Well folks enter the Jew! In a 1992 essay this lovely (ahem) mulatto Jewess named Rebecca Walker, penned a paper and within it we find that this is the first instance of the word “Feminism” being used for Women’s Liberation. Yep. The half African half Jew Princess (who’s mother wrote The Color Purple) took over the “movement”! She is credited with it! Of course she is, she is a Jew after all…
 “It has been proposed that Walker has become somewhat of a symbol of the third wave’s focus on queer and non-white women. Third Wave feminists have broadened their goals, focusing on ideas like queer theory and abolishing gender role expectations and stereotypes.” -Rebecca Walker
Walker took over what the White Women had started. It should be no surprise what the ultimate goal was. But in case you don’t “get it” let me spell it out for you. White women’s blood memory started to awaken and these women “felt” it was unfair that they did not have a right to vote. The Woman’s Suffrage movement was born. As the movement grew and time went on, the White woman’s blood memory continued to awaken. Women were getting tired of being “subjected” to their husbands (along with many other issues of unfairness). Women’s Liberation was born. Women’s lib did a lot of good things to free White Women from the shackles that were imposed upon them via the Jew/Christian imposition and Jewish/Christian inspired laws.
Heathens all know that Christianity was and still is the Jew’s main weapon upon European Culture. In fact, Christianity can be classified as the original Cultural Marxist and Universalist ideology. Christianity was created specifically to enslave our folk, especially our women, by turning our own against us in a very strong but subtle way.
Christianity as a religion is dying. The point being that the Jews know they are losing the grip they had over us and our women via Christianity. Enter the perfect takeover. Women’s Liberation becomes entwined with the Jewish inspired vile, nasty, non-white, homo loving, male hating ideology known as Feminism. It is no wonder the word has negative connotations. I certainly do not want to be grouped in with Jews, non-whites, gays and lesbians, and especially those who wish to do away with the greatest asset we have, our men and in turn our family unit. It is so important to realize that when our women, White Nationalist Heathen women, stand up for our rights we are NOT advocating anything that the Jewess Walker started. We are not advocating for the removal of men. And we are not advocating for a “goddess” culture… As if! What we are advocating for is the restoration of what we ALWAYS had before Christianity came and took it all away.
The 3 Abrahamic Religions. Do you see the similarity?
Now I say Christianity because it was the final blow, however we can historically see that where ever the Arab has had business and intermingled within the culture of the White native peoples, slowly over time their ideologies changed. And no matter how much I hate to say it but if anyone has ever been hoodwinked by Jewish propaganda (that men are superior in all aspects to women) truth be told, it was the ruling class who lapped that crap up like candy. And honestly, the candy was pretty damn sweet. Who doesn’t desire “power” and he-man status? It is natural after all, but it is NOT who we are! These people murdered our Fathers and Mothers. Wake up! You do not have to subjugate women in order to be a man! Men say they are the protectors of their women, that is their main role. I agree. However when a White Nationalist woman speaks out about the injustice she sees to her people who is the first to slander her with the word “feminist”? Who? I’ll tell you who, the other side of the feminist coin, those who profess to be pro-white Nationalists, members of the manosphere and also members of the AltRight. Yeah, I see the White Nationalist going down the toilet via the AltRight. History always repeats, its just like what happened when degenerates entered the White Women’s movement in the 90’s, and from what I see degenerates are all up into the AltRight. They even postulate that immigration is not a problem. Talk about being “cucked”… It is disgusting.
The men I respect, that I adore, the REAL men, are those men who stand up to the Jewish CRAP and defend the positions of Heathen White Women. Why? Because they KNOW our history! They do not fear their women. They fully understand the Natural Traditional Dynamic. They do not blame women, especially their White sisters, wives and daughters for the JEWISH sickness that we ALL must deal with. They also do not group their women in with the degenerate non-whites when trying to prove their points.

I will give you just one example of what happens when you allow the Jewish/Arabic influence into your world and they take away the established rights of the people (which back in the days of our ancestors was punishable by death), Ancient Egypt. I will use Ancient Egypt, as it is claimed to be one of the oldest civilizations on the planet. When Egypt started it was ruled by Caucasian peoples (proven via DNA). Where these people came from and what happened to them is up to speculation. I believe they fled North and those who remained got bred out of existence. You know, the same thing that happens to all multicultural societies. They did, however, leave us some records on day to day life.
Ancient Egypt, 3100 B.C, A White Empire: The formal legal status of Egyptian women (whether unmarried, married, divorced or widowed) was nearly identical with that of Egyptian men. Both women and men could act on their own and were responsible for their own actions. This is in sharp contrast with some other ancient societies, e.g., ancient Greece, where women did not have their own legal identity, were not allowed to own (real) property and, in order to participate in the legal system, always had to work through a male, usually their closest male relative (father, brother, husband, son). Remember, Greece was in Persian hands. Egyptian women were able to acquire, to own, and to dispose of property (both real and personal) in their own name. They could enter into contracts in their own name; they could initiate civil court cases and could, likewise, be sued; they could serve as witnesses in court cases; they could serve on juries; and they could witness legal documents.
The legal independence and identity of Egyptian women is reflected not only in the fact that they could deal with property on the same terms that men did and that they could make the appropriate contracts in their own names, but also in the fact that they themselves were held accountable for economic transactions and contracts into which they had entered. Women worked outside the home alongside their husbands, today we would call it a Mom & Pop. Women were allowed to vote, although few of them did. They were allowed to rule as Pharaohs. Egyptian Marriage Contracts concern themselves only with economic matters–the annual responsibility of the husband to feed and clothe the wife (and their children) and the right of their children to inherit his wealth–and are better called annuity contracts. Because Egyptian women were full participants in the legal system, not chattel and not dependent on a man to handle their legal concerns for them, such contracts were made by the husband directly with the wife, not her father or any other man on her behalf. Divorce and remarriage seem to have been relatively easy and relatively common. There is little convincing evidence for polygamy, except by the king, but extensive evidence for “serial monogamy.” Either party could divorce a spouse on any grounds or, basically, without grounds, without any interest or record on the part of the state. The above excerpts were taken from a paper online housed at the University of Chicago. You can read more here: http://fathom.lib.uchicago.edu/1/77…
Nearly 5100 years later and look…
Egypt Today non-white: CAIRO, Feb 23 2015 (IPS) – In November 2013, a Thomson Reuters Foundation survey ranked Egypt as the worst of 22 Arab states with regards to women’s rights. In Egypt, if you are a man, you can literally kill your wife and get away with it. But, but … Women destroy Nations! It was because women had those rights that Egypt failed. It was because women had rights that all the great Empires fell!  Really? Who was the last ruler of Sumeria, Babylon, Egypt, Greece and Rome? Who? What people have always been involved, intermingled, lived within each of these Empires? I will tell you, it was the Jews/Arabs. Yes, in every single one. Were these Empires racially pure at their end? No, each one was a multicultural society. So who/what caused their demise? Just look at the common denominator. Multiculturalism. I will be doing another work based upon this principle and will show via sourced evidence that in fact women do not destroy nations.

Now, what is needed to build a nation? What is needed to people a planet? Men AND Women. The stronger the men and the stronger the women the stronger the Nation. Not rocket science. So why would someone who claims to be an “ally” of the White Race parrot the LIE that women destroy nations? Think about it.  Those who do not know their history are bound to repeat it. Enough said. The feminists of today are NOT the same women who advocated for FREEDOM from being subjected to their husbands. Today they are vile. nasty, non-white, amoral, man hating pieces of trash. And when you group White Nationalist women in with them then you have identified yourself as a traitor to the White Race. Period. The only men who fear educated, empowered White Nationalist Women are those men who are working towards our demise, ie: manosphere. If women get back the standing that our Ancestor Mothers had the Jew would not stand a chance against us.
They know this, it is time you did too! This is why they take everything good and turn it into garbage. Open your eyes white man. Open your damn eyes. Do you agree we are in a silent war with the Jew? Then think about this… In battle what would be your first target? That what makes your enemy stronger or weaker? Whites are STRONGER TOGETHER AS A MALE / FEMALE TEAM! In Summary: White women in our history were not denied social status, leadership or a voice. Cultural Marxism as it is known today has been around a very long time. The first major cultural shift of our culture can be traced back to the forced implementation of an entirely new religion, Christianity. Christianity removed our Native Gods and subjugated women under men. The same ideals can be seen within her sister religions: Judaism and Islam. Suffrage was about re-gaining the right of women to vote. Removing the non-whites changes the statistics on voting patterns Women’s Liberation attacked other issues for women, such as domestic violence, divorce, property rights, equal pay for equal work, etc. Jews took over Women’s Liberation around 1992 and turned it into Feminism.
Feminism looks nothing like Women’s Liberation. Feminists now promote vile and degenerate behaviors, it has degraded our women and also promotes hating men. Anything good they stood for has been tainted. Women do not destroy nations. There is ZERO evidence that any woman ruler was at the helm when an Empire dissolved. That notion is parroted around by the manosphere is to cause division within our race and ultimately cause division within the family unit. Like its counterpart, feminism, its sole purpose is to promote hatred between sexes. Multiculturalism, and by extension, miscegenation is what destroys nations. The fact that the Jews are always part of the citizenship should give us a clue. I believe we should be advocating for a Meritocracy.I can give NUMEROUS examples of the same type of transition that happened to Egypt within Europe but because this article is so very long, and because I have already covered a lot of this material in past articles, I will leave that to a future work. In the meantime you can read my other article that ties into this one here.
Advertisements

22 thoughts on “Suffrage, Women’s Lib, Feminism & Cultural Marxism

  1. Excellent!
    thanx from a PROWhiteMan who is not afraid to share the WHITE FUTURE with an equally PROWhiteFEMALE.
    This is a very informative article.

    Liked by 1 person

  2. “The slogan ‘the emancipation of women’ was invented by jewish intellectuals and its content was formed by the same spirit.”(Hitler, party rally of The National Socialist Women’s Organisation, 1934).
    “Jewish woman have played a significant role in all aspects of the American feminist movement. Whether agitating for the reform of marriage and property laws, woman suffrage, birth control, improved conditions for working women, the Equal Rights Amendment, or a myriad of other causes aimed at fostering equal opportunities for women, they lent their support to and often pioneered campaigns for women’s rights.” (Joyce Antler)
    “Linking feminist goals with Jewish loyalties… Indeed, the League’s strong feminist commitment became quite clear as it joined secular national and international suffrage organizations.” (Jewish Women’s Archive).
    “Jewish women emerged as national leaders of the suffragette movement”( Jewish Americans and Political Participation, Medoff, 2002).
    Carrie Chapman Catt joined the Iowa suffragettes and lead organisations but the Iowa suffragettes was not formed by her, she joined them fortyish years after they began their ideals. In the book, ‘Carrie Chapman Catt’ by Jacqueline Van Voris, it states (as do many other books containing suffrage and Catt) that she and her jewish best friend Rosa Manus (who was apparently gassed at Auschwitz);
    “Together they went to the International congress of women in Chicago and while there they sought advice from prominent jews who were already organising to relieve the desperate plight of the German jews. Catt saw a way to extend the range of humanitarian agitation and formed the protest committee of non jewish women against the persecution of jews in Germany, which mounted a drive for signatures to a letter protesting the German pogrom. “We cry out by this method to all the nations our horror over the mistake the German people have permitted to be made.”
    Catt was also the first woman to receive the ‘American Hebrew Medal’ in 1933 for her work helping jews. It continues”Catt and nine other women then formed a committee of ten to ask the president Roosevelt to ease immigration restrictions and permit entry of refugees suffering under persecution”. This means Catt actively agitated against Germany during the war and worked for jews. The quote from your above text;
    “Women’s lib did a lot of good things to free White Women from the shackles that were imposed upon them” I would like to briefly discuss ‘Twilight sleep’ in the US it was named ‘The Prophylactic Forceps Operation’ created by Jewish man Joseph De Lee who was urged and paid for by campaigning feminists/suffragettes (of whom a lot were jewish) to bring birthing away from communities and into hospital. The procedure was to literally shackle women to beds, cribs or cages whilst drugging her with hallucinogenics which later had an amnesiac effect. The woman would be cut wider during labour and then her baby would be pulled out by forceps, all whilst she was drugged, but not in any pain relief (as giving pain relief with the amnesiac was causing mass maternal mortality). Women left hospital unaware but covered in bruises and with skin missing from their wrists, women would be restricted as they would become violent to themselves and others, bashing their heads against walls, they had to wear head cushioning. Shekels paid for the shackles which literally took away our right to womanhood.
    Feminism from the preliminary first wave until now has been orchestrated by jews. Encouraging white women to put themselves and capitalism before their families, to embrace ‘free love’ and abortions whilst gathering immigration laws in the background.
    I had to reply to this article because the notion that my ancestors awoke to a jewish psychological operation to socially engineer a massive family divide is not something I agree with.

    Liked by 1 person

  3. “The slogan ‘the emancipation of women’ was invented by jewish intellectuals and its content was formed by the same spirit.”(Hitler, party rally of The National Socialist Women’s Organisation, 1934).
    “Jewish woman have played a significant role in all aspects of the American feminist movement. Whether agitating for the reform of marriage and property laws, woman suffrage, birth control, improved conditions for working women, the Equal Rights Amendment, or a myriad of other causes aimed at fostering equal opportunities for women, they lent their support to and often pioneered campaigns for women’s rights.” (Joyce Antler)
    “Linking feminist goals with Jewish loyalties… Indeed, the League’s strong feminist commitment became quite clear as it joined secular national and international suffrage organizations.” (Jewish Women’s Archive).
    “Jewish women emerged as national leaders of the suffragette movement”( Jewish Americans and Political Participation, Medoff, 2002).
    Carrie Chapman Catt joined the Iowa suffragettes and lead organisations but the Iowa suffragettes was not formed by her, she joined them fortyish years after they began their ideals. In the book, ‘Carrie Chapman Catt’ by Jacqueline Van Voris, it states (as do many other books containing suffrage and Catt) that she and her jewish best friend Rosa Manus (who was apparently gassed at Auschwitz);
    “Together they went to the International congress of women in Chicago and while there they sought advice from prominent jews who were already organising to relieve the desperate plight of the German jews. Catt saw a way to extend the range of humanitarian agitation and formed the protest committee of non jewish women against the persecution of jews in Germany, which mounted a drive for signatures to a letter protesting the German pogrom. “We cry out by this method to all the nations our horror over the mistake the German people have permitted to be made.”
    Catt was also the first woman to receive the ‘American Hebrew Medal’ in 1933 for her work helping jews. It continues”Catt and nine other women then formed a committee of ten to ask the president Roosevelt to ease immigration restrictions and permit entry of refugees suffering under persecution”. This means Catt actively agitated against Germany during the war and worked for jews. The quote from your above text;
    “Women’s lib did a lot of good things to free White Women from the shackles that were imposed upon them” I would like to briefly discuss ‘Twilight sleep’ in the US it was named ‘The Prophylactic Forceps Operation’ created by Jewish man Joseph De Lee who was urged and paid for by campaigning feminists/suffragettes (of whom a lot were jewish) to bring birthing away from communities and into hospital. The procedure was to literally shackle women to beds, cribs or cages whilst drugging her with hallucinogenics which later had an amnesiac effect. The woman would be cut wider during labour and then her baby would be pulled out by forceps, all whilst she was drugged, but not in any pain relief (as giving pain relief with the amnesiac was causing mass maternal mortality). Women left hospital unaware but covered in bruises and with skin missing from their wrists, women would be restricted as they would become violent to themselves and others, bashing their heads against walls, they had to wear head cushioning. Shekels paid for the shackles which literally took away our right to womanhood.
    Feminism from the preliminary first wave until now has been orchestrated by jews. Encouraging white women to put themselves and capitalism before their families, to embrace ‘free love’ and abortions whilst gathering immigration laws in the background.
    I had to reply to this article because the notion that my ancestors awoke to a jewish psychological operation to socially engineer a massive family divide is not something I agree with.

    Liked by 2 people

    1. The research that I completed was geared towards the woman’s vote, nothing else, where the MAJORITY of women involved were Christian women. Even the Jewish woman’s website states they were not involved nor cared. The few women they list for the “first wave” women’s right to vote, were Atheists or married to Christian men. MOST of the Jews were involved with other activities, such as forming Unions to improve working conditions for women, during the first wave. They even state they were “left out” and during the early 80’s is when they specifically formed an organization to literally take over the movement. So because a scarce few in the beginning were involved you are willing to throw the baby out with the bathwater?

      Infant mortality rates have drastically decreased. In fact my son and I would both be dead if I had not delivered in a hospital. https://ahundredyearsago.com/2012/04/10/neonatal-and-infant-mortality-rates-1912-and-2012/

      Abortions have been happening since the beginning of time… birth control was illegal in this country. Which is safer, birth control or unassisted abortion? These women pushed to legalize birth control.

      The idea that our bodies belong to us is NOT WRONG. Being in love before you get married, is not wrong. “Free love” didn’t come about until the 60’s and 70’s.

      In any rate, my point being that we already had all of these “rights” before the Arabic influence came upon Europe back BEFORE Christianity.

      As far as “awaking” to a Jewish campaign is ludicrous. I showed the ideology came about in Europe long, long ago…

      Liked by 1 person

      1. Simone de Beauvoir wrote that “the first time we see a woman take up her pen in defense of her sex” was Christine de Pizan who wrote Epitre au Dieu d’Amour (Epistle to the God of Love) in the 15th century. Heinrich Cornelius Agrippa and Modesta di Pozzo di Forzi worked in the 16th century. Marie Le Jars de Gournay, Anne Bradstreet and Francois Poullain de la Barre wrote during the 17th. (Note: none of these folks were Jews)

        Christine de Pizan presents her book to Isabeau of Bavaria, Queen of France.
        Christine de Pizan presents her book to Isabeau of Bavaria, Queen of France.

        French poet Christine de Pizan born in 1364 in Venice, Italy. de Pisan is best remembered for her revolutionary works on women. In Epistre au dieu d’amour (1399), she explored the status of women within society and critiqued their depiction in literature. With La cité des dames (1405), which is considered to be one of the first feminist texts, de Pisan profiled leading female figures from history and advanced the idea of gender equality. She continued to espouse the rights of women in Le livre du trésor de la cité des dames (1405). Both of these feminist books were later translated into English. Sometime after France lost the Battle of Agincourt, she decided to enter a convent located in Poissy, France. De Pisan wrote little while at the convent. In 1429, she penned a work to praise Joan of Arc. This proved to be her final contribution to literature. De Pisan died at the convent around 1430.

        Liked by 1 person

  4. According to the Jewish Women’s Archive in an article titled, “Jewish League for Women’s Sufferage” we read: The Jewish League for Woman Suffrage (JLWS) was the only Jewish women’s organization in England—and the world—devoted exclusively to obtaining both national and Jewish suffrage for women. Founded on November 3, 1912 by a group of distinguished female communal leaders, the League proclaimed twin goals: “to demand the Parliamentary Franchise for women on the same line as it is, or may be, granted to men, and to unite Jewish Suffragists of all shades of opinion for religious and educational activities … [It will also] strive to further the improvement of the status of women in the [Jewish] Community and the State.”

    The existence of the League was rooted in the upper-class social status, family connections and communal distinction of its leadership—factors which gave these feminists the self-confidence that enabled them to face the intense antagonism generated by their suffrage activities. Conversely, that same elite social status made League women acceptable to the Christian-dominated suffragist movement.

    A little further down the page we read: “In contrast to the United States, therefore, England’s class and religious distinctions facilitated the creation of a unique Jewish suffrage organization and Anglo-Jewish women’s admittance to the English campaign for the ballot. As a result, members of the Jewish League for Woman Suffrage sought the franchise in a very different manner from their counterparts in the United States.”

    Liked by 1 person

    1. From the same Jewish Women’s Archive we find an article titled, “Feminism in the United States” we read “…the relationship between Jewish women and feminism has been complex. Despite the energetic contributions of individual Jewish women and of Jewish women’s groups to these movements, not all Jewish women’s organizations enthusiastically supported the goals of equality or enhanced political rights for women, at least initially. Nor did American feminists acknowledge the substantial contributions of Jewish women to their cause. Feminists, moreover, only rarely spoke out in defense of Jews when they were under attack in the United States or abroad; women’s rights proponents and their allies themselves frequently espoused anti-semitic, anti-immigrant or anti-Zionist views.

      Liked by 1 person

  5. Are you stating that Hitler was wrong to suggest that feminism was a jewish marxist ideology? Are you defending that Catt was not involved in Jewish aid against Germany?
    I will respond in order of posts.
    You say that; “the MAJORITY of women involved were Christian women” Yes a lot of quackers were involved, also a lot of associations were headed by jewish women https://www.darkmoon.me/2016/jewish-first-wave-feminists/ at the bottom of this article you will find names of jewish activists.
    “MOST of the Jews were involved with other activities” yes, they have from the very beginning been involved in immigration rights, as I showed Catt was very keen on ensuring jewish settlements.
    Yes I am willing to throw the baby out of the bath water, just as they are willing to pull babies from the bellies of mothers unnaturally, another article about twilight birth, http://www.renegadetribune.com/hospital-births-replaced-home-births/
    which I believe is the very worst and sick result of feminism and mostly unknown.
    jewish Emma Goldman discussed ‘free love’ numerous times, in books, essays and her magazine, in which she trashes wedlock as hopeless and without love, this was around 1915.
    “Abortions have been happening since the beginning of time… birth control was illegal in this country. Which is safer, birth control or unassisted abortion? These women pushed to legalize birth control.” These birth control centers which were opened are now family planning clinics, who were run and opened by jewish women. Of course there is also the concern of pharmaceutical companies using synthetic hormones in contraception which are cancerous, cause infertility, kill early pregnancies; do some research. The pill is harmful.
    You stated “As far as “awaking” to a Jewish campaign is ludicrous” but your article says, “White women’s blood memory started to awaken and these women “felt” it was unfair that they did not have a right to vote. The Woman’s Suffrage movement was born.” this gave the opinion that you were saying Aryan womankind awoke to what I know to be a jewish social engineering operation called the suffragette movement known as feminism.
    On to your second post back. There are many claims of who was the first feminist thinker, and you are right it certainly was not Catt, she was busy being indoctrinated by jews to help take down Hitler.
    Your third post.
    They started with the JLWS and then went into other associations, “Jewish women emerged as national leaders of the suffragette movement Maud Nathan and Martha Klatschken, for two, were especially well known for their oratorical abilities and organizational know-how. Their imaginative protest tactics, such as delivering a nonstop twenty-four-hour-long streetcorner lecture,or giving what is called a silent speech, whilst standing before a vacant store, helped draw attention to the cause. Rather than organize a distinctly Jewish branch of the suffragette movement, however Nathan and her colleagues believed it would be more effective to mobilize Jewish women to join the ranks of the women’s rights movement as a whole”( Jewish Americans and Political Participation, Medoff, 2002).
    Fourth post.
    “enthusiastically supported the goals of equality” this is a problem, Hitler said, and I believe. We are not equal, we are ‘equivalant’, regarding men and women.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Emma Goldman was an Athiest.

      Carrie Chapman Catt, third president of NAWSA, did not exhibit the anti-Jewish, anti–Old Testament hostility of her predecessors, but she nonetheless alienated some Jewish women with her anti-immigrant rhetoric and the claim that the “ignorant foreign vote” was a grave threat to democracy. (from the Jewish Women’s website).

      Most women of the time were against Immigration, the Jews however were not. Hitler is irrelevant. However, the Jewish women’s website states: “Secular feminists’ failure to denounce German antisemitism in the 1930s, and their minimal support of the NCJW’s program of rescuing refugees from fascism, reflected the continuing gap between the Jewish women’s groups and the broader feminist movement.

      You can hold your ideals about women being subjected to men. I disagree. We are not to be subjected to anyone, we are EQUAL partners.

      MERIT is what determines the best of the best, not the sex of the individual.

      Liked by 1 person

  6. I have learned a lot from reading your responses to each other. I think that, like most things jews find opportunities within movements to push their agendas. I’m sure there were some well meaning White women who were pushing for the vote, not knowing what the overall agenda was. I do have to say, that a lot of the natural birth advocates, doulas and midwives tend to label themselves “feminists” and they really have done a lot of good work for women. However on the flip side, we have the pink armpit hair dyke-freaks who take it to the extreme of just all out male hatred and using abortion as a form of b/c. You both have opened my eyes to a lot of things I didn’t know before and I thank you both for that. I think this topic would make for a great round table discussion where each person could bring their research to the table and hash it out. Hoping to see some of your articles up here Aria!

    Liked by 2 people

  7. You say, “Emma Goldman was an Athiest” does that mean you believe a jewish athiest is not jewish? that it is only a religion?

    In your main article you state, “Carrie Chapman Catt is the woman who supposedly started the Suffrage movement in America” you now in the comments section state “Carrie Chapman Catt, third president of NAWSA”, you appear to be confused as to her role. Are you saying she did not get awarded from jews for helping jews? I am only discussing her because you originally gave her such high status.

    You state, “Hitler is irrelevant”?????????????????

    Again as you so rightly point out, jews never continue to complain about anti-semetism, whilst always getting what they want. jewish people claim to be the most targeted for hate crime at a ridiculous percentage.

    I did not say about women being subjected to men. I said we are equivalant and not equal, which means equal in value, not ability as determined biologically.

    The sex of the individual determines what they are best at. National Socialism gave its people the opportunity to go with nature, not against it. To play to their strengths.

    I forgot to say earlier, your point “In any rate, my point being that we already had all of these “rights” before the Arabic influence came upon Europe back BEFORE Christianity”, surely you meant jewish influence?

    Liked by 1 person

  8. There is an error… Elizabeth Cady Stanton is who started the movement. Stanton firmly believed that women should have command over their sexual relationships and childbearing. As a mother who advocated homeopathy, freedom of expression, lots of outdoor activity, and a solid, highly academic education for all of her children, Stanton nurtured a breadth of interests, activities, and learning in both her sons and daughters.

    Stanton posited that women voters of “wealth, education, and refinement” were needed to offset the effect of former slaves and immigrants whose “pauperism, ignorance, and degradation” might negatively affect the American political system.

    So according to you we should ignore the noble White Women because Jews were involved? There is also no evidence that THEY started the movement, however there is ample evidence that they weaseled their way INTO it.

    No, I meant exactly what I said. Arabic, Semitic, those people. I am not a NS I am a WN. Hitler is over a thousand years AFTER we officially lost our status to Christianity … I do not believe in Socialism (it is no different IMO than Communism) I advocate a Meritocracy.

    Liked by 1 person

  9. You state “Elizabeth Cady Stanton is who started the movement”. Again you are forgetting the jew. Jewish woman Ernestine Rose is coined to be the most influential leading American and British pioneer and lecturer of women’s suffrage. “Rose was one of the first to speak publicly in America on women’s rights, and the first to petition for women’s rights’ (Ernestine Rose Society). She was known as ‘the queen of the company’.
    http://www.brandeis.edu/wsrc/affiliates/ernestinerose/

    Arabs did not bring christianity to europe, it was the jews.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Who exactly do you think Jews are? They are Semitic, Arabic peoples. The whole ideology of the Abrahamic cults come from there. They do not originate in Europe… their 3 religions are foreign to our people.

      The website National Women’s History Project an article called History of the Women’s Rights Movement we read: “The Women’s Rights Movement marks July 13, 1848 as its beginning. On that sweltering summer day in upstate New York, a young housewife and mother, Elizabeth Cady Stanton, was invited to tea with four women friends. When the course of their conversation turned to the situation of women, Stanton poured out her discontent with the limitations placed on her own situation under America’s new democracy. Hadn’t the American Revolution had been fought just 70 years earlier to win the patriots freedom from tyranny? But women had not gained freedom even though they’d taken equally tremendous risks through those dangerous years. Surely the new republic would benefit from having its women play more active roles throughout society. Stanton’s friends agreed with her, passionately. This was definitely not the first small group of women to have such a conversation, but it was the first to plan and carry out a specific, large-scale program.”

      According to the Jewish Women’s archive, one of the earliest activists on behalf of equal opportunity for women was Ernestine Rose. (Rose btw was an avid Athiest, Her father was a Rabbi). While in England she met and married William Ella Rose, a Christian jeweler and silversmith. In May 1836 the Roses emigrated to the United States. Rose was elected president of the National Women’s Rights Convention in October, 1854 in spite of objections that she was an atheist. Her election was heavily supported by Susan B. Anthony, who declared that “every religion – or none – should have an equal right on the platform”. On June 8, 1869, she and her husband set sail for England, she died in England in 1892.

      Her causes of the abolition of slavery, religious tolerance, public education and equality for women.

      Like

  10. Oh yeah, forgive me the Arabs run hollywood lol

    Stanton held that tea party possibly discussing Rose’s ideas, as she normally did, because she was in owe of her as they both gathered together petitions throughout the 1940’s. Little does that matter though because she is an atheist right? Just like the communists who killed all of the Christians, they were not really jews either then in Donna’s world.

    I will leave this argument with this last comment as I shall not be continuing this debate…
    You stated in your above article “Carrie Chapman Catt is the woman who supposedly started the Suffrage movement in America, and no, she was not a Jew. In fact when I look up all the women who were involved within the movement when it began with the exception of a couple of black women, they were all White Christians. And believe me, if there was a Jew involved back then we would know about it… ”

    Well now you do!

    Like

  11. Where do you think Judaism originated? Where EXACTLY? FYI It originated with the ARABS in the Middle East. Not sure who you think Jews are? White Europeans or Arabs? If they are white Europeans then guess what it boils down to religion and in that case Stanton was not dealing with a Jew, she was dealing with an Athiest… I suppose if she had accepted Jesus then she wouldn’t be a “jew” in your eyes? As far as their RACE they are Arabic, the men kidnapped our little girls and made them mothers (why do you think they trace their heritage through the mother, so they can be sure the line IS Arabic, as the males pork everything) … Communists who killed Christians? LMAO What about the Christians who killed our Ancestors? SMH They are no different IMO.

    The Jewish Women’s Website lists less than a handful of Jews who were involved in SUFFRAGE – ie: the women’s right to VOTE, and one of them left for England and DIED before the 19th Amendment was passed. FACT.

    Like I said the Jews infiltrated a WHITE MOVEMENT… there are too many sources that show this beyond doubt. Including their own Women’s website. SMH And you have yet to prove they “Started” the idea… Just saying 🙂

    Liked by 1 person

  12. I am so glad I found this site! Thank you so much for writing it. I was beginning to think that even my beloved heathenry was being lost Jewry and now I have found a strong hold. A note on where the whites in egypt went. I am from New Zealand and here we have the Maori people, who upon arrival found blonde haired white skinned races living here. Those people are still around (much to the annoyance of the Maori as they were notoriously violent and tried very hard to cannibalize them out of existence). Any way this tribe of fair skinned people who are now called Ngati Hotu had verbal traditions that they were from ancient persia and had fled during a time of war. In recent year DNA testing has proven that the tribe does in fact have ancient Persian ancestry. It was a big thing here for all of about 2 days then it all but disappeared from main stream media.

    Liked by 1 person

  13. Equity feminism got hijacked in the 1960s by Jewesses (Friedan, Abzug, the half ‘Jew Steinem, etc.). Now we have radical or gender feminism which promotes animosity towards men and all things masculine.

    Women ought not attack or despise men. In the US, marriages fail at an alarming rate and many people do not get married. This is due in no small part to this radical feminism.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s