The Níðings Among Us

Níðing – One lower than those around him. An outlaw, an enemy to mankind. A despicable being.

Nithings were judged by their deeds. Their deeds included: murder, theft, nightly arson, as well as any deeds that harmed the kinship’s legally protected rights. Also any crimes offending the deities, such as breaking a special peace treaty, trespass, defilement of graves, sorcery, effeminacy and same-sex intercourse between men. And finally, all deeds indicating moral degeneration, such as oath-breaking, perversion, and acts of nasty cowardliness.

Punishment was severe. The outlaw was not only expelled from the kinship, he was also regarded henceforth as an enemy to mankind. His assets were seized, and if he had a family, his wife and children were legally considered widowed and orphaned. Nobody was allowed to protect, house, or feed the outlaw. He must seek shelter alone in the woods, just like a wolf, or be killed.

There is nothing more damaging to our folk than those within our fold who hold Semitic ideologies and push these ideologies upon us under the guise of being traditional. Those who believe in this ideology are our enemy and they have been. and will continue to be, the destruction of our race. Today we apparently have many who are under the spell of the enemy, who are lapping up this poison like it is ice cream. They are not only attacking our women but also our men and this is something we can not stand for. Today I wish to call a few of them out.

I will start with a person who goes by the name of Heartiste. This person’s supposed real name is James C. Weidmann. He runs a website that on the surface appears to be “pro male” and supposedly teaches men how to be an “Alpha” while at the same time makes our women out to be nothing more than sex toys and baby machines. Anyone who objects to his line of thought is called a Feminist if female or a beta if male.

I think what most may not realize is how he secretly degrades our men. One such post I saw was a “market value test for men” where they answer questions then they add up their scores to see how they rank, and if they score too low then they don’t have “game” and therefore they are useless betas or worse, omegas and shouldn’t even be alive. He even gives them a point for having been arrested and subtracts points if they have an IQ that is too high. What?

Market value test scores for men

When you dig a little deeper you find there are posts about how to get a girl to send nude pictures of herself. And if that wasn’t bad enough, he has taken one study about rape fantasies of women that surveyed only 355 female college students in Texas and pushes it as some sort of definitive proof that educated women secretly want to be raped. In fact he has over 6 blog posts (possibly more, I stopped counting) in the last year regarding this “fact” of his. What he fails to mention is there have been other studies that show that there is a huge difference between fantasy and reality regarding rape and the domineering male. Such as this one below:

The difference between fantasy and reality using guided imaging.

He must not have read his entire report because at the end it says quite plain that rape fantasy is not the same as literally being raped.

Regarding rape fantasy…they do not typically include uncontrolled violence. 

Here is the study he bases his opinions on. And another study he uses here.

There are a few things that we need to understand about these studies. First is that there were only 355 students interviewed and that those students were not all white females, there was a pretty even mix of whites and non-whites. And second, 355 students obviously is not representative of the overall population, like he and his sheeple would like to believe. Why is he doing this? I have no clue but he is giving the green light to guys out there to go ahead and take what they want from the girls, without remorse. It makes me wonder also if this isn’t somehow feeding the black on white crime spree we have been witnessing… I’ll have to look into that some other time.

No healthy minded intelligent woman wants to be raped

He even goes so far as to say that these women, who have been date raped, have been known to continue to date their rapist, totally ignoring the fact that these woman are suffering from what is known as trauma bonding. However it matters not, his sheep fall right into line as can be witnessed by the numerous comments on his articles, such as this one:

No means yes?

Or this one:

Just pretend you care, it will be okay. 

What makes a man an “Alpha” is not how many women he can sleep with. Alpha males do not disrespect, degrade and use their female counterparts for sexual exploits. Where is the honor for the folk in that? And just exactly how does this promote traditional family values and/or edify our men and women? It does not. Instead of teaching honor, this guy is promoting moral degeneration. Disagree with him and you are a Feminist or a Beta male. Heartiste/Weidmann is a Nithing.

An excellent edifying website for men I came across is this one  25 Characteristics of an Alpha Male.

Quoting from his list:

The alpha male knows how to treat a lady. He respects women, often because he’s had some great one’s in his life. He’s chivalrous. He helps his lady at every chance. He helps her reach her dreams, all-the-while moving closer to attaining his own.


I also can’t ignore what is on the other side of the coin. Here we have what I call the Extreme Feminists. Women who hate men. These women run around topless, screaming, getting arrested, and for what? What does showing your tits prove? These women saw an opportunity to parade around like uncontrolled brats and have corrupted (I believe intentionally) something valuable to our folk, which is the beginning of the restoration of our old and truly traditional attitudes, and twisted it into something vile and disgusting. These obviously Jewish led women have no moral fiber and are not only an embarrassment to our folk, but are being used as a tool against all good women.

When you hear feminism is this what you think of? 

It is because of them and their Jewish masters that women such as myself and many like-minded females are called feminists. This is exactly how the Jew wants it. Think about it, who controls our media and who shapes our opinions? When you hear the word Feminism, what is the first thing that comes into your mind? Does it make you cringe? It makes me cringe. I bring these females up because the word feminist, thanks to Jewish lead media, is now a demeaning term that is used against good women who are truly trying to restore our European traditions. Men like Heartiste use these women as an excuse to hate all women. Good, wholesome women are now being grouped in with these women because we disagree with being subjugated and treated as property. In any rate, these extreme females (male haters) are also Nithings and are useless in our society.

Women are our greatest asset!

Apparently there are many of these Nithings running around. We can find them within the the throngs of the Alternative Right too. They are using the bait of bringing people together for the common good of the white race. The main problem is they will let literally anyone in. They have people represent them, such as a guy known online as Ramzpaul, who laughs at miscegenation of white males with Asian women, saying it is fat bitchy women who cause it. Jack Donovan, another well known personality, is openly homosexual and believes in the total control of women by males (no surprise there). Lana Lokteff on camera said she believes women should not vote and white people are stupid.

Red Ice Radio gives airtime to people like Curt Doolittle, not just once but twice. This “man” celebrates race-mixing and is also a member of the AltRight.

Approves of race mixing.

And when I questioned him on his ideology where women, because they vote according to their biological imperative, MUST be forced into submission even if it means beating them, never replied with a valid answer. In fact to this very day (June 28th) he has not given me any statistical data to back up his claims. Why? Because there isn’t any statistical data to be had. It is only his opinion.

screen shot
Still waiting

Again we also see the lack of knowledge coming from him when he wonders why we don’t we return to beating our women. Although I must say I am not surprised. He is referring to the 3rd world, the Middle East, where they actually condone as a society this type of behavior.

…beat the hell out of women who are out of line.
Women are like jews

These assumptions are easily disproved with the facts.  Here is one that is less than 2 years old, and surprisingly it shows the white vote.  According to a Newsweek Wall Street Journal poll from December 2014:

The poll also shows a puzzling gender gap, with men more likely to support immigration than women. Among men, 52% say it helps more than it hurts, with 39% saying it hurts more. Women were evenly divided, with 45% on each side.

And the article goes on to show:

That immigration gender gap is even more pronounced among whites. About half (58%) of white men say immigration helps more than it hurts, while 42% say it hurts more than it helps – that’s a net positive of 7 percentage points. Just 39% of white women say immigration helps more than it hurts, while 52% say it hurts more than it helps – a net negative of 13 points. Add it together and that’s a 20-percentage-point difference in how white men and women see the issue. “ (emphasis mine) Read the poll results here.

Here is another good source

hat shows by RACE that white women and black women do not vote the same (Blacks vote like Jews). All white voters regardless of age —18-29, 30-44, 45-64, and 65 and older — voted a majority for Romney. All other racial ethnic groups, regardless of age, voted unanimously for Obama.

So women vote like Jews? It does not look that way to me. Unless the Jews somehow flipped and are anti-immigration and didn’t vote for Obama. Doubtful. Show these guys proof, and they still don’t agree – you are a Jew, a feminist or you are cucked.

In fact, the more I dig, the more it comes into light that one of the main themes running throughout the AltRight is the complete and utter control of women under the guise that it is somehow traditional to our folk to force women to be mothers and homemakers, at the youngest age possible, some say puberty, and by all means keep them uneducated and out of politics. Why? Well, they say it is because women have ruined nations. When asked for sources or other proof of their claims, I always get nothing. Do these attitudes sound familiar? They should, as it is exactly how the Middle Eastern live.


middle east
Very semitic attitude posing as a White Male Nationalist Heathen.  

I am so incredibly disgusted with these people. Why are they even allowed a voice? I have over twenty six followers who also follow this impostor. When I called him out I was (true to form) immediately labeled a goddess-worshiping feminist. Funny that.

Quote from Seanna Fenner, Odinist

When we read historical accounts, such as Tacitus’ Germania (117 AD), we get a glimpse of what life was like before the Roman/Christian/Semitic ideologies were forced upon our people. There are many such accounts which show that before this Empire began, men and women had shared responsibilities, respected each other as partners, and had great love for each other. This is a completely different relationship between men and women than what we have had for almost the last 1700 years. This true history is what we must learn about and continue to fight to restore. Note the first paragraph, men did not despise their women’s counsels

Exceperts from Tacitus Germania


The Patriarchy we have been living under is not traditional to our people. We have literally hundreds of sources to which we can turn to prove this fact. What they want you to believe is not true. Our history was not completely destroyed via the book burning rituals that happened so frequently in our post Christian days. It is preserved in the Greek and Roman historical accounts of the barbarians (which means outsiders) and within our folk tales and lore, within the sagas and plays that have been preserved and that give us shining examples. Our history is also within our blood memory.

The fact is we had neither a Patriarchy nor a Matriarchy, but we did have a Meritocracy. One of the main aspects of our folk was the value we placed on being the best, also known as Merit. As Tacitus noted of the Germans:

The master is not distinguished from the slave by being brought up with greater delicacy. Both live amid the same flocks and lie on the same ground till the freeborn are distinguished by age and recognized by merit.

In today’s Jewish run Christian world merit has been thrown out the window. Those who continue to support such systems that are counter to a merit-based system are our enemies.

Ron McVan wrote an article on Meritocracy, which you can read here.

The real reason we are in such a pickle is not because our women are out of control.  It is because of the Semitic influence that took away the social status of the female and turned her gifts into sins. It also took away merit. In so doing Cultural Marxists of old destroyed our kindred’s legally protected rights. This is exactly what Christianity (the destruction of our true culture) continues to do today. Christianity is Cultural Marxism turned into religion.

The first Cultural Marxists, those who wished to destroy our Aryan culture, entered into our world and finished off our remaining barbarian cultures during Roman times. In fact, I do believe that at the end Rome was actually run by the Jews. Rome, and by extension, Christianity was not the beginning of our traditional ways, it was the end of them. Does the last Roman ruler look European to you?

The last Roman Ruler Julius Nepos (check out the nose)

When someone parrots off that homosexuals should be accepted or when they teach our men and women that one sex is superior to the other, it is plain they are not our allies. They are our centuries-long enemies. Men and women who hate and abuse each other are also our enemies. Those of us who know the truth and fight for a true restoration of our traditional values and complete removal of the Jewish influence (our only hope for survival as a race) are not feminists nor cucked betas. These men and women are in reality the true heroes and heroines of our race.

I wish we could just grab all of these Nithings by the seat of the pants and push them out into the wilderness to live among the wolves, hopefully to never be heard from again. Since we can no longer do this (legally) it is our duty to resist and expose them for what/who they actually are.

I leave you with #11 of the Odinist Creed:

Men and women are not enemies in our tradition as they are in the Semitic cults. We are beloved companions. We seek the best mates of our kind because we are a people who believe in friendly competition and striving for excellence in all things. A noble and great man should seek to win a virtuous woman who is beautiful in body, mind, spirit and character, while women should seek to be worthy of such regard, and to select the best possible man as a husband. It goes without saying that Odinist men do not tolerate disrespect of worthy women of their own kind, especially by skraelings. We consider children a great gift from our Gods and where at all possible, seek to fully enjoy the blessings of a large family, as the Gods wish this happiness for us. As a tribe, we are all an extended family and bear great love for one another. We hold consideration of nationality and governments a distant second to the bond of blood.





25 thoughts on “The Níðings Among Us

  1. Well Donna were you having a bad day when you wrote this. This little article of mine may help to address the balance:

    The mythology of the Aryan (Proto-Indo-European) people was most clearly a solar mythology. It was solar, masculine and virile. The term virile is to be found in many Indo-European languages and can be traced back to the PIE *wehros. The term can be found in many of the writings of Baron Julius Evola (1898-1974). Let us read what Baron Evola has to say about the word:

    “Vira is a term with the same Latin root vir, which does not describe an ordinary man (homo), but rather an eminent man. The term denotes a manly and ‘heroic’ nature (vira is sometimes used as a substitute for ‘hero’), which is essentially determined by the rajas guna.” (The Yoga of Power. Tantra, Shakti, and the Secret Way.)

    The vira is thus a superior and virile man. He is dominant and has an inherent superiority over both weaker men and women. The vira has a special energy or force called viriya, derived from the same PIE root:

    “For this reason, the texts speak also of a special strength beyond knowledge, of a ‘superior and powerful energy’ (viriya), which differs from the normal human energies and which alone works the miracle of ‘liberation of the will by means of the will’; it provides the strength for endurance and allows of advance toward supreme liberation.” (The Doctrine of Awakening. The Attainment of Self-Mastery according to the Earliest Buddhist Texts)

    “According to the polyvalence of the technical terminology of Tantrism and hatha yoga, however, the same word virya can also designate the male seed, which in a more general context connects with the theory that to man as such, owing to the simple fact of his manhood, or purushmatra sambandhibhih, has been granted the potential to attain the supernatural completion of himself.” (Eros and the Mysteries of Love. The Metaphysics of Sex)

    Now it should be obvious to the vast majority of my readers that the vira, an exceptional man is by necessity a tiny minority and indeed when one considers the abject state of ‘manhood’ today we see that the typical male is a metrosexual, devoid of masculine energy, a parody of man with his handbag, waxed hair, skin moisturiser, make up and obsession with showering every five minutes. The metrosexual is the marketing man’s dream for he is void of race and to a large extent gender. More often than not he is also a product of the modern middle classes (the mercantile class) and has a university indoctrination, trained not to think independently but to chant the mantras of his puppet master. Not surprisingly the average ‘white’ male with his lack of masculinity is not attractive to the female of the race, who at the same time has been trained via the media (most notably television and sluttish women’s magazines) and schooling to behave in a masculine way. She has been indoctrinated into falsely believing that she is the ‘equal’ of man, that she has the same capabilities which to my readers will no doubt be viewed as an absurdity and rightly so.

    By contrast the unseen hand who is directing the media in the west is encouraging a masculine negro type to be the preferred mate of the Nordic woman. It is only the ‘white’ male who has been emasculated. I know of no other race which has been targeted by this pernicious propaganda. The negro and ‘white’ woman are now depicted as the intelligent and courageous ones whilst the ‘white’ male is portrayed as stupid and lacking in courage. If this were any other race or gender being targeted in this way there would be cries of ‘racism’ and ‘sexism’.

    The latest piece of insanity by the outgoing Prime Minister David Cameron in permitting women to become combat soldiers will no doubt damage the long term health of women and in some cases cause chaos in the trenches. Those female soldiers who are not given to sluttish behaviour or assuming that they are the equal (or even the superior) of man or are not lesbians (and there are plenty of those to be found in uniform) will be in my view, and it is only a personal opinion, a minority. Why any woman would wish to assume an occupation that is the preserve of a man as soldiering obviously is, is beyond my comprehension. Nature has developed the female to be the bearer of the race and her strength is in this capacity, something which few men would wish to undergo. By the government pursuing a policy of pushing more and more women into the labour market it is interfering with the dynamics of family life and is hell-bent on further devaluing the role of man as master of his hearth.

    At this juncture let us examine the etymology of the word ‘husband’. It is derived from Old English husbonda which in turn is derived from Old Norse husbondi which can be broken down into two separate elements; hus-‘house’ and bondi-‘one who has a household’. So it is clear that our ancestors, both Christian and pre-Christian viewed the man as the master of the hearth, and not the woman. This is nature’s way and it is or was OUR way until it was undermined in the 1960s.

    No doubt my opponents will quote a handful of exceptions to this rule, namely female monarchs of the past but these women only rose to prominence due to the lack of a male heir or in times of dire necessity where typical roles assigned by gender may need to be temporarily deviated from. But these examples are only a handful and this should only apply in times of dire necessity. One only has to look at the occasions when women are handed supreme authority. I am thinking in particular of Elizabeth I, queen of England 1558-1601. She was like many queens, a tyrant who had no qualms about the shedding of blood, innocent or not. Mary I, queen of England 1553-1558 executed 300 protestants at the stake. We have the more recent examples of Margaret Thatcher, Prime Minister of the United Kingdom 1979-1990 who divided British society and destroyed the manufacturing base of the country, suppressing the miners’ strike with great brutality. Now we have a second female Prime Minister in Theresa May who openly models herself on Thatcher-or at least encourages the comparison. She has said in Parliament that she would be ready to give the order to press the button that would unleash a nuclear holocaust and murder millions of innocent people. THIS is what happens when you place a woman in charge of an organisation or a country-they try to outman the men and appear more ‘macho’.

    Man is no longer the master of his hearth, appearing to take the lead from television advertising he now wears a pinny and does the baking for his family when instead he should be the hunter-gatherer. It is the role of the wife to keep his household in order using the authority of her husband. This is why even today in debased marriage ceremonies where women are encouraged no longer to ‘obey’ their husbands, the father still gives away his daughter even when she has already been deflowered by the groom! It is an echo of recognition of the former authority of man over his household which includes his wife. For this reason in most western countries the wife and the children assume the surname of the man. It is an indication that they are his property.

    This my readers is what society in the west is like in the 20th and 21st centuries but this should not be the way of those who subscribe to a folkish Weltanschauung. We must restore the correct relationship between males and females and restore the ancient Aryan order of caste.

    Let us consider what Baron Evola has to say about this development:

    “The emancipation of women was destined to follow that of the slaves and the glorification of people without a caste and without traditions, namely, the pariah. In a society that no longer understands the figure of the ascetic and of the warrior; in which the hands of the latest aristocrats seem better fit to hold tennis rackets or shakers for cocktail mixes than swords or sceptres; in which the archetype of the virile man is represented by a boxer or movie star if not by the dull wimp represented by the intellectual, the college professor, the narcissistic puppet of the artist, or the busy and dirty money-making banker and the politician-in such a society it was only a matter of time before women rose up and claimed for themselves a ‘personality’ and a ‘freedom’ according to the anarchist and individualist meaning usually associated with these words. And while traditional ethics asked men and women to be themselves to the utmost of their capabilities and express with radical traits their own gender-related characteristics-the new ‘civilisation’ aims at levelling everything since it is oriented to the formless and to a stage that is truly not beyond but on this side of the individuation and differentiation of the sexes.” (Revolt Against the Modern World, )

    Man must take the initiative in claiming his mastery over the hearth. Once again he must choose a suitable mate for his daughter, perhaps giving her a choice from a prearranged selection. By not doing so and instead trusting his daughter to make this decision herself (and thus ignoring the capricious nature of the female) he is abrogating his rights and responsibilities as a father. He is risking the pollution of his bloodline via either miscegenation or the mating with a man of inferior type such as a drunkard, alcoholic, a criminal or one who is workshy. Both men and women must once again understand that they are not the owners of our genes but their custodian. It thus behoves us to ensure that we fulfil the trust of our ancestors and future descendants.


    1. Your “Baron” was born in the 19th Century, pro-Christian and practiced sex magic, did LSD or other hallucinogens and we should take his advise? … lmao The guy was a 1900’s Buddhist hippy! Thanks, but no thanks. I prefer to live by the EXAMPLE of MY Ancestors… which BTW you are painfully NOT aware of.

      Liked by 1 person

      1. Why is this moron on a site that is clearly NOT christian? Do you see us going over to christian websites and evangelizing? No! He is the perfect example of the mental illness known as “christ-insanity”.

        Liked by 2 people

      2. Are you able to substantiate your allegations regarding Baron Evola being a xtian? That he ‘did’ LSD or ‘other hallucinogens’, that he was a ‘1900s hippy’? Or do the facts not concern you Donna?
        The Baron was born in 1898. In addition the hippy phenomena began approximately in the year 1966. To the best of my knowledge as a man who would have been in his late 60s at the time he was not a ‘hippy’ and as he was a master of natural techniques in self-individuation he would have no need of any psychoactive substances. So perhaps you could enlighten me?


      3. He wrote about his experiences in his books, which you obviously have not read. He was not an Odinist. He did not practice Odinism. So what does it matter? His opinions are IRRELEVANT to the discussion.

        Liked by 1 person

  2. In the “ancient order of caste” it had to do with, workers, warriors and nobles. And even THEN fathers did not “give away” their daughters. This is a middle eastern ideology and is not European. I suggest you study proto-indo-Europeans … Indo-Iranians (Scythians) are NOT Europeans (didn’t even share language) but rather invaders into Europe who were eventually conquered and bred into the proto-indo-European clans… one being the Sarmatians, a FEMALE warrior klan.

    Liked by 1 person

  3. I will probably catch slack for this but these turds believe that Aryan is middle eastern (Iranian) and therefore should treat their women in the same degrading way. They believe the Aryan people came from the middle east (and can therefore IGNORE the proto-indo-Europeans) … This is why I prefer the term “Thuleain” over Aryan, as it represents European values and not non-white ones. The indo-Iranians were race mixing, nomadic pieces of shit…. and to use them as an example (of an Aryan-European) shows how lacking they are in Europe’s own history. LOL


  4. Sinead, is fiction more important to you than truth?
    If you care to explore my 3 blogs you will see that I am a high profile practising Wodenist, having penned numerous articles critical of semitic religions whether they be Christianity, islam or Judaism.
    By the way I would like to ask you about your views on having negro friends and whether this is compatible with being a ‘white nationalist’?


    1. No one here gives a rats ass about your opinion. Obviously you have no clue as to what European Culture was like, especially when you place women as some sort of subservient creature to men. I can list (and have listed) numerous sources that refute your “Baron said” claim… Go back to your own blog. You bore me.

      Oh yeah, and I will add this.. what is your purpose if not to wake people up? And when you do, or they do wake up to the facts you degrade them for being brainwashed in their past? Yeah, because YOU are the only PURE fool out there who has never had a black friend, or a Mexican friend or an Indian friend… Lucky you, you grew up in an all white neighborhood and never went to public school. Get real.

      Liked by 2 people

  5. Donna it usually helps to research a subject before you take such a confirmed stance! May I direct you to my Aryan Myth and Metahistory and Celto-Germanic Culture, Myth and History blogs where I have penned numerous articles on the caste system which was not unique to the Indo-Iranians but to all Indo-European peoples. You need to update yourself on the latest genetic research: there is no evidence for the colonisation of Europe by Indo-Iranians-the direction of invasion was from Europe to the east, the Vedic culture of India being the product of Nordic European tribes.
    I am highly suspicious of people who on the one hand claim to have a racial Weltanschauung and yet would deny the name ‘Aryan’ applying to the Indo-European populations of Europe. If you care to read my blogs you will find an abundance of evidence regarding the use of the term ‘Arya’ in Europe but there is NO evidence whatsoever that they called themselves Thuleans or Thuleain (sic).
    If you put aside your feminism for a moment I suggest that you study the ancient history of the Germanic and Aryan peoples and in so doing you will begin to realise that most of the modern marriage customs have their roots in antiquity. The father gave away his daughter for a price, paid by the groom or his family. I realise that this may come as quite a shock to your feminist ideology.


  6. Donna, I suggest that you use google image search-it will reveal some interesting images of your friend. I find it incredible that someone can have a host of negro friends one minute and then claim to be a racialist the next-it is inconsistent.
    As far as Europe is concerned Donna the difference between you and I is that I am a European-you appear to be an American. I would suggest that I know a little bit more about my continent than you do just as I would not seek to lecture you on the history of your continent.
    I will take it from your reply that you simply invented those allegations about Baron Evola? If not, I am still waiting for your sources, the evidence please Donna.
    Now try and remain polite-it is the Aryan thing to do! Getting emotional will not strengthen your feminist arguments!
    As far as state schools are concerned, yes I did go to them. I was not privately educated. However you and Sinead must have known SOME white people that you could have befriended instead? Is the racial problem THAT bad?


    1. Those were from 8 years ago. I guess you better come hang me since I took pictures w non Whites. Get over yourself. You are not welcome here. Good bye!

      Liked by 2 people

      1. Quote: ‘Aryan’ applying to the Indo-European populations of Europe… end Quote

        The indo-europeans are NOT the same people as the proto-indo-Europeans. The indo-europeans were nomadic invaders into Europe. The proto-indo-Europeans lived in houses in communities, farmed, wove cloth, worked with metals, etc… They are the people we get our pantheon of Gods and Goddesses from, not the Indo-Europeans who worshiped the “male sky god of fire”… We come from a different place.


  7. I have seen the pictures. Like I said, you grew up in an all white neighborhood, went to an all white school, work at an all white job, right? Let me tell you something… We have to deal with these people on a daily basis… and those who are not racially aware can not be held responsible for having “friends” of a different race when they are a victim of the system. You want to BLAME someone then blame the one’s who are orchestrating our destruction, not the ones who have awakened and are trying to FIX it.

    Have you not read the Baron’s books? He is pro Christian, he had done drugs to reach enlightenment (he says they didn’t work for him) and he was a Buddhist, NOT AN ODINIST. Huge difference…

    Also we are not talking geographical location, we are talking about Ancestry of European peoples, for which I have spent the bigger part of the last 15 years in study. Don’t assume because I do not live there that I do not know shit about MY Ancestors. SMH

    Liked by 1 person

  8. Donna, I have over a dozen of the Baron’s works on my book shelves. Which one would you like to discuss first?
    The Baron was no more a Christian than you are a zen Buddhist. However that is not of any relevance to his views on the caste system and the ancient concept of Tradition which underpins all his works. However I must add to that that Buddhism is not a religion but a means of achieving Awakening and self-individuation. The Baron also wrote on the subjects of the Grail and Alchemy. He simply researched and applied traditional systems that worked. All of these systems were rooted in ancient Aryan antiquity. Although I am a professed Wodenist that does not prevent me from exploring any and every pathway as the High Lord Woden Himself is the great initiator and the means to knowledge and mastery of the Self.
    Studying Europe is one thing-we have all done that but I have spent nearly 60 years living in Europe and that is the qualitative difference-I wright and speak from experience.
    Again I am awaiting your evidence that the Baron was a drug user and Christian.


  9. Donna, is this a new theory of yours, that the Indo-Europeans (presumably the descendants of the Proto-Indo-Europeans or Aryans) are not in any way related to the Proto-Indo-Europeans either culturally or linguistically?
    Do you have any evidence to support your presumably matriarchal theory?


    1. I’m not here to prove anything to you. Research it yourself. I already have. Look up the work by European Archeologists, it has been proven that the Indo-Europeans were NOMADS who migrated INTO Europe and made war with the inhabitants (the proto-indo-europeans) The Aryans were Indo-Iranian, not proto-indo-european… two different people. Start with the Scythians… Google it if you can’t afford to buy books on the subject … I am not “Matriarchal”, even though some believe the proto were, I do not because they had the same pantheon of gods as the Odinist of today do. I said I believe in a MERITOCRACY. That is what our lore, (and the examples given by our Gods), and historians tells us we were/are.

      Liked by 1 person

      1. today they are mixed in with Europeans but way back shortly after the last ice age they were two different peoples.


      2. He’s no longer welcome to comment here. We don’t need his argumentative “contributions” and immature, emotional outburst/name calling.

        Liked by 2 people

  10. A Democracy is not based on merit and is one step away from Communism. It is in fact the complete opposite of a system based on Merit. In a democracy the scum are allowed to vote. Which is why the “west” is in the pickle it is in today. It is not the best who win, it is the one with the most votes.

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s